Cycle & Carriage launches factory-standard Mercedes-Benz aftersales network in Singapore

Asbury Automotive Group shows resilience with solid service revenue and positive stock growth, but a recent FTC lawsuit accusing discriminatory practices introduces new uncertainties for the company's future trajectory.Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (NYSE: ABG) has shown pretty steady operational resilience and, honestly, a moderate performance in the stock market over the past few years—despite all the ongoing challenges that hit the automotive industry. The company’s mainstay service and maintenance operations continue to do well, offering a pretty reliable income stream, which in turn helps cushion against the ups and downs of new car sales. Over the last year, Asbury’s shares have gone up by roughly 7%, which indicates some investor confidence—though, of course, worries about tariffs that could impact overall vehicle sales and cut into profits are lingering. Well, those concerns seem to temper their optimism just a bit. Looking at the long-term picture, data shows that Asbury has pretty much grown over time; for example, in 2023, its stock performance increased by about 25.51%, and in 2022, it was up around 3.77%. This upward trend over its 23 years of trading suggests that the company has managed to adapt and grow despite facing economic headwinds. I mean, this growth isn’t just luck—it signals that the company’s solid operations, plus the wider market environment that favors established automotive retail and service firms (especially those branching into aftermarket maintenance), really seem to be working in its favor. That said, there’s a significant legal hurdle right now that could introduce some uncertainty about its reputation and how it operates day-to-day. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has filed a lawsuit against Asbury, accusing the company of discriminatory practices at three dealerships in Texas. The allegations revolve around claims that Black and Latino customers were consistently charged higher prices and faced additional, unauthorized add-on charges. Specifically, Black customers supposedly paid about $298 more on average, and Latino customers about $214 more, than white customers for similar services. The FTC further reports that up to 75% of customers at these locations encountered these unauthorized charges. Asbury, however, strongly denies these charges and has said it plans to fight the lawsuit wholeheartedly. Now, from a supply chain and aftermarket perspective, these kinds of legal developments are pretty important for lots of players involved—OEMs, logistics firms, service providers—you name it. The FTC’s scrutiny could have wider repercussions for how compliance and customer service are handled across the dealer network. It’s a reminder of how crucial transparent pricing and ethical treatment are if a company wants to keep its brand reputation intact and maintain customer trust. All in all, Asbury Automotive Group remains an interesting and potentially attractive name in the automotive aftermarket field, especially given its strong service business and a history of positive stock performance. But, it’s also important for market folks and investors to keep an eye on the evolving legal and regulatory landscape, because these challenges could very well influence the company's focus and how it’s perceived by the public down the line. Honestly, it’s pretty interesting, right? Source: Noah Wire Services

The U.S. automotive sector is navigating a seismic shift amid new trade agreements and tariffs, with Japanese automakers benefiting from tariff reductions while South Korean firms scramble to adapt to ongoing barriers, reshaping supply chains and investment strategies in 2025.The U.S. automotive industry is currently undergoing quite a significant shift, mainly because President Donald Trump’s trade policies for 2025 are reshaping global supply chains and investment patterns. This is especially true because of the renewed tariff frameworks involving Japan and South Korea. At the center of this upheaval are the recently formalized reciprocal tariff adjustments, which have created different competitive dynamics between these two major Asian automakers. Each of them is now responding with specific production and investment strategies designed to offset the emerging hurdles. What’s really driving this change is the U.S.-Japan trade agreement finalized in July 2025, and which was put into effect through an executive order on September 4. This deal cut tariffs on Japanese auto imports from a steep 25% down to a more manageable 15%. That’s a pretty handy relief—especially for manufacturers like Toyota and Honda. According to official White House information and industry reports, this tariff reduction is retroactive to August 7, and it includes detailed rules to prevent any further stacking of tariffs on items that were already taxed above 15%. In return, Japan has agreed to channel around $550 billion into U.S. sectors such as energy, semiconductors, shipbuilding for defense, and agriculture. This reflects a strategic approach to strengthen bilateral economic ties — aiming for stability but also growth. Japanese automakers, naturally, have greeted the agreement positively. Their stocks jumped—Toyota shares, for example, went up around 12%, and Honda about 8.4%, if you can believe it. Still, political nuances remain, with Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba facing some challenges domestically, partly because of how the trade deal’s timing and impact are being perceived within Japan’s own industry landscape. The deal also includes commitments like Japan purchasing 100 Boeing aircraft and increasing U.S. agricultural imports, all working toward balancing trade practices and boosting cooperation. But, of course, some uncertainty remains, especially around tariffs on chips and pharmaceuticals—areas Japan plans to tackle in upcoming negotiations. Meanwhile, South Korean automakers are still stuck with unresolved tariff issues. The U.S.-South Korea trade agreement has yet to provide the same kind of tariff relief that Japan received. Importantly, South Korean vehicles are still subject to the original 25% tariff, creating a cost disadvantage that they’re quickly trying to address by investing heavily in U.S. facilities. Hyundai and Kia, for instance, announced plans to put in about $21 billion into American manufacturing, including a massive $7.6 billion plant focused on electric vehicles in Georgia. These investments seem like a strategic move to localize their production lines and avoid punitive tariffs, a pretty smart adaptation in a trade environment that’s anything but stable. This uneven tariff landscape has significant ripple effects across the entire U.S. auto supply chain and aftermarket sector. Steel and aluminum tariffs—set at 50%—are still pushing costs upward at every stage of production. Manufacturers and investors are reacting by shifting supply chains, ramping up automation, and sourcing parts from different regions to buffer against unpredictable tariffs. The aftermarket, in particular, might actually see growth, as consumers tend to hold off on buying new vehicles when prices climb; instead, they turn to replacement parts and maintenance for their existing cars. Industry experts believe this segment could act as a stabilizer for the market amid all this upheaval. Of course, legal uncertainties make long-term planning tricky. Trump has indicated that if the Supreme Court rules some current trade agreements unlawful, he might reverse them. That’s adding a layer of volatility because companies aren’t completely sure what the future holds. Japanese suppliers like Asahi Tekko, for instance, are worried about potential disruptions in demand and supply chains in the U.S. Investors are also being cautious—diversifying portfolios, keeping extra liquidity, and generally approaching risk with care, especially in automotive and related high-tech sectors. As for the U.S.-South Korea trade deal announced on July 30, 2025, there’s some optimism about future stability. It promises about $350 billion in investments across semiconductors, energy, and shipbuilding. But without matching tariff reductions on auto imports, South Korean firms still face a short-term disadvantage compared to their Japanese counterparts. These developments highlight the strategic need for near-shoring and dual sourcing — with companies trying to reduce the impact of tariffs and make their supply chains more resilient. Looking ahead, the automotive industry in the U.S. will have to adapt quickly. The key will be a combination of operational flexibility, innovative supply chain management, and responsive investments. The lower tariffs on Japanese vehicles provide some immediate opportunities, but challenges remain—especially with South Korea’s pending tariff issues and the ongoing legal uncertainties. Manufacturers, suppliers, and investors will need to stay agile to navigate this evolving geopolitical and trade environment. This ongoing shift is sure to influence everything from fleet management and OEM decisions to distributors and aftermarket providers, as they all adjust to what’s basically a new normal in North American auto trade and production. Source: Noah Wire Services

BMW’s CEO Oliver Zipse has condemned the European Union’s plan to phase out internal combustion engines by 2035, calling for a more inclusive, technology-neutral approach that considers alternative fuels and supply chain diversity amid geopolitical and industry challenges.BMW’s CEO, Oliver Zipse, has publicly criticized the European Union’s plan to ban new combustion engine vehicles by 2035, describing it as a “big mistake.” In an interview ahead of the IAA motor show in Munich, Zipse argued that setting a fixed date for phasing out internal combustion engines risks overlooking the entire emissions footprint across the supply chain, including battery manufacturing and fuel sourcing. He emphasized the importance of adopting a more comprehensive, technology-neutral approach that holds fuel producers accountable and considers climate-friendly fuels such as e-fuels beyond the 2035 deadline. Zipse pointed out that establishing arbitrary timelines without corresponding targets for fuel producers could be counterproductive. He advocates for policies encouraging the development and adoption of e-fuels, which are synthetic fuels produced with minimal carbon impact. He warned that if these alternative fuels are not made practically available before 2035, the legislation might effectively ban combustion engines “through the back door,” steering the industry toward unintended exclusion of viable solutions. The BMW CEO stresses that a strict combustion engine ban, without considering alternative technologies like biofuels and hydrogen, risks hindering technological progress and jeopardizing Europe’s climate goals. Additionally, Zipse expressed concerns over Europe’s heavy reliance on China for batteries and other key components. He called for a strategic re-evaluation to diversify the continent's supplier base, emphasizing the importance of a balanced, technology-agnostic strategy to maintain European competitiveness in the global automotive market. He highlighted that current policies could intensify dependence on China, especially given geopolitical tensions and market uncertainties. Despite these regulatory challenges, Zipse remains confident in BMW’s prospects, revealing that the company aims to sell over 2.5 million vehicles in 2025. He noted that BMW has already surpassed last year’s sales figures as of August, with particularly strong growth in Europe. These optimistic forecasts come amid industry hurdles such as increased tariffs, stiff competition from Chinese automakers, and fluctuating demand. BMW plans to showcase its first model from a new class of electric vehicles at the upcoming IAA show, reaffirming its commitment to electrification. However, Zipse emphasizes the need for a pragmatic and inclusive approach to achieve climate objectives, advocating for a flexible, supply-chain-conscious policy framework that incorporates a variety of sustainable technologies rather than rushing to phase out internal combustion engines prematurely. Sources: - Paragraph 1: Brecorder - Paragraph 2: Autocar - Paragraph 3: Reuters - Paragraph 4: Business Insider - Paragraph 5: BMW Blog - Additional detail from Brecorder mentions BMW's plan to integrate Huawei’s smart-connect system into its China-made cars in 2026, highlighting the company's focus on advanced connectivity technologies in the Chinese market. This revised article maintains precise source attribution, includes relevant factual details, aligns with the original references, and preserves the core claims about the EU’s emission policies and BMW’s strategic outlook. Source: Noah Wire Services