Getz Automotive’s expansion highlights its growth and community-driven approach in Fuquay-Varina

Asbury Automotive Group shows resilience with solid service revenue and positive stock growth, but a recent FTC lawsuit accusing discriminatory practices introduces new uncertainties for the company's future trajectory.Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. (NYSE: ABG) has shown pretty steady operational resilience and, honestly, a moderate performance in the stock market over the past few years—despite all the ongoing challenges that hit the automotive industry. The company’s mainstay service and maintenance operations continue to do well, offering a pretty reliable income stream, which in turn helps cushion against the ups and downs of new car sales. Over the last year, Asbury’s shares have gone up by roughly 7%, which indicates some investor confidence—though, of course, worries about tariffs that could impact overall vehicle sales and cut into profits are lingering. Well, those concerns seem to temper their optimism just a bit. Looking at the long-term picture, data shows that Asbury has pretty much grown over time; for example, in 2023, its stock performance increased by about 25.51%, and in 2022, it was up around 3.77%. This upward trend over its 23 years of trading suggests that the company has managed to adapt and grow despite facing economic headwinds. I mean, this growth isn’t just luck—it signals that the company’s solid operations, plus the wider market environment that favors established automotive retail and service firms (especially those branching into aftermarket maintenance), really seem to be working in its favor. That said, there’s a significant legal hurdle right now that could introduce some uncertainty about its reputation and how it operates day-to-day. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has filed a lawsuit against Asbury, accusing the company of discriminatory practices at three dealerships in Texas. The allegations revolve around claims that Black and Latino customers were consistently charged higher prices and faced additional, unauthorized add-on charges. Specifically, Black customers supposedly paid about $298 more on average, and Latino customers about $214 more, than white customers for similar services. The FTC further reports that up to 75% of customers at these locations encountered these unauthorized charges. Asbury, however, strongly denies these charges and has said it plans to fight the lawsuit wholeheartedly. Now, from a supply chain and aftermarket perspective, these kinds of legal developments are pretty important for lots of players involved—OEMs, logistics firms, service providers—you name it. The FTC’s scrutiny could have wider repercussions for how compliance and customer service are handled across the dealer network. It’s a reminder of how crucial transparent pricing and ethical treatment are if a company wants to keep its brand reputation intact and maintain customer trust. All in all, Asbury Automotive Group remains an interesting and potentially attractive name in the automotive aftermarket field, especially given its strong service business and a history of positive stock performance. But, it’s also important for market folks and investors to keep an eye on the evolving legal and regulatory landscape, because these challenges could very well influence the company's focus and how it’s perceived by the public down the line. Honestly, it’s pretty interesting, right? Source: Noah Wire Services

The market for multilayer ceramic capacitors used in vehicles is poised for significant expansion, thanks to advances in miniaturisation, safety systems, and global supply chain shifts, with Asia-Pacific leading the charge.The market for multilayer ceramic capacitors, or MLCCs, used in automotive electronics, is really showing some strong growth these days. It’s mainly fueled by big technological shifts and the way vehicle electrification is changing. In fact, the sector was valued at about $12.8 billion in 2024, and it’s expected to grow to nearly $19.7 billion by 2032. That’s a compound annual growth rate—CAGR—of around 6.5%. This upward trend basically highlights how crucial MLCCs are in stabilizing semiconductor functions and managing power signals, especially given the more and more complex electronic systems in today’s cars. Now, MLCCs are pretty much essential passive components in vehicles because they pack a high capacitance punch and can withstand tough automotive environments. A typical modern vehicle is estimated to have somewhere between 3,000 and 5,000 of these units—way more than the roughly 1,000 capacitors you’d find in high-end smartphones. This huge number actually points to how dominant the automotive industry is in the MLCC market. And especially with electric vehicles—well, those numbers jump even higher. For EVs, you’re looking at upwards of 10,000 MLCCs per car, due to their complex power management, battery inverters, and advanced driver assistance systems, or ADAS. Asia-Pacific is leading the charge when it comes to this market. It controls over half of the global share, with China alone making up about 32%. Japan, on the other hand, is a big player as well, being the top exporter of finished vehicles—shipping roughly 3.5 million units in 2022, which shows its strong position in supply chains for components like MLCCs. Government push for electrification and hybrid tech in this region has definitely helped boost demand here. As a result, the CAGR for Asia-Pacific’s automotive industry is forecasted at about 7.6% through 2033, making it a vital engine for growth in the overall MLCC ecosystem. Another important factor driving this market forward is the rise of ADAS. Vehicles with things like collision avoidance and lane-keeping aid, and even autonomous driving features, need high-reliability MLCCs that meet industry standards like AEC-Q200 certification. Usually, these systems use between 500 and 800 specialized MLCCs each, and in premium vehicles, that number can be even higher. Globally, safety regulations are pushing automakers to include more of these gadgets, which keeps the demand for capacitors that are durable and can perform well even under tough conditions, pretty steady. In response to these needs, manufacturers are also innovating in miniaturisation. Packages that used to be 0603 (that’s a size code for surface-mount devices) are now shrinking down to 0201 and even smaller sizes. And, interestingly enough, they’re doing this without sacrificing capacitance strength. Big players like Murata Manufacturing, TDK, Samsung Electro-Mechanics, and Taiyo Yuden are at the forefront, developing ultra-compact, high-capacitance MLCCs that can handle higher temperatures and voltages. These advances allow for better component density on circuit boards, meaning the cars can feature more sophisticated functions without taking up more space. Material science is also making big waves here. Technologies like atomic layer deposition are helping improve dielectric layer uniformity and increase capacitance density—pretty handy for next-gen MLCCs. Plus, manufacturers have ramped up production in North America and Europe to reduce lead times, especially as global supply chains have faced disruptions lately. These moves help them stay responsive and competitive. As for the market landscape, it’s pretty competitive but somewhat oligopolistic—mostly dominated by Japanese and Korean firms. Murata, for example, holds nearly 40% of the worldwide market by leveraging its technological edge and strong partnerships with OEMs. TDK and Samsung also hold sizable shares and are pushing forward with innovations in miniaturization and reliability. Newer Chinese companies like Holy Stone and Walsin Technology are entering the scene as well, mainly competing on price and production scale, backed by government R&D investments. Established players are countering by localising their production and bolstering their high-temperature, high-voltage MLCC portfolios, which are essential for EVs, ADAS, and connected car systems. Looking ahead, the growth of vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communication and 5G connectivity in cars promises to open up new markets for RF-optimized MLCCs that deliver high-Q stability across broad frequency ranges. It’s pretty interesting, right? These emerging applications give MLCC makers more room to innovate and grab market share. All in all, the automotive MLCC market seems set for sustained expansion. Factors like vehicle electrification, smarter safety systems, miniaturisation, and improving communication tech will keep fueling growth. With ongoing advances in materials and manufacturing, and strategic expansions globally, MLCC suppliers are in a good position to meet the increasing demands of both the aftermarket and original equipment manufacturers (OEM) well into the next decade. Source: Noah Wire Services

The European Union’s plan to phase out combustion engine vehicles by 2035 is becoming increasingly complex as industry players call for a more flexible, technology-neutral approach amid geopolitical and supply chain uncertainties.The European Union’s plan to ban combustion engine (ICE) vehicles by 2035, which was once seen as a clear-cut milestone in cutting down automotive emissions, has turned into a pretty tangled regulatory mess. It’s now a battleground where shifting political priorities clash with industrial pragmatism. This shift really highlights the wider challenges automakers and investors are facing — as they try to navigate a landscape that’s becoming more unpredictable, especially when it comes to the pace and technology choices for the transition. Initially, the goal was pretty straightforward: halt new ICE car sales by 2035 to push toward a zero-emission future. But lately, the European Commission has started to question this tight timeline, mainly because of ongoing worries from the industry about fragile supply chains, not enough infrastructure, and stiff international competition—particularly from China. In response, they've introduced a three-year period for averaging compliance between 2025 and 2027. Basically, this gives automakers a bit more leeway to meet CO₂ targets without penalties. This regulatory flex reflects the reality that sticking rigidly to such a strict deadline might harm Europe’s automotive industry’s global competitiveness or even cause market instability. Political dynamics within the EU make things even more complicated. The European People’s Party (EPP), which holds a lot of sway in the European Parliament, has expressed doubts about the economic impacts of the ban and is pushing either to soften or completely reverse it. Meanwhile, big manufacturers like BMW and Mercedes-Benz are calling for a more flexible, technology-neutral approach—one that doesn’t just focus on electrification but also includes hybrid systems and alternative, more climate-friendly fuels like e-fuels and biofuels. This shift towards a broader, more inclusive toolkit for decarbonization seems to be gaining ground. BMW is a prime example of this adaptable mindset. Despite its big push toward electrification, it’s still heavily investing in advanced combustion engines and hybrid tech, preparing for scenarios where ICE vehicles powered by renewable fuels stay viable. CEO Oliver Zipse has even slammed the 2035 ban as a “big mistake,” arguing that a more comprehensive approach—considering actual lifecycle emissions, including battery production and fuel sourcing—is critical for real sustainability. BMW’s success in surpassing its 2024 EU CO₂ targets by 12% shows that a diversified strategy can be effective. Plus, it positions them well if future policies become more flexible. On the flip side, automakers that are fully committed to battery electric vehicles (BEVs) face some real risks. Take Hyundai and Kia—they’ve expanded their EV production significantly in Europe, but if the ban gets delayed or relaxed, all those heavy investments in battery cell factories and charging networks could be in jeopardy. Kia’s Europe boss, Marc Hedrich, has voiced worries that changing the ban could rack up “a fortune” in costs and throw their carefully planned EV rollout off course. And Tesla, which is all about BEVs, might also find itself exposed if future laws favor alternative fuels or extend the lifespan of ICE vehicles. Financially speaking, the stakes are pretty high. BloombergNEF estimates that just delaying the ban by a year could cost EV-focused companies as much as €15 billion in lost revenues, thanks to stranded assets and supply chain issues. Meanwhile, manufacturers like BMW—who mix hybrid and ICE tech with their EV lines—are better suited to handle shocks and can adjust their investments more flexibly while still maintaining market share. From an investment standpoint, backing automakers with diversified tech portfolios seems smarter because it offers better regulatory flexibility and risk reduction. As emissions standards keep evolving, companies that can adapt quickly—by shifting between EVs, hybrids, and alternative fuels—are in a stronger position. This reduces the risk of heavy losses if policies change suddenly or if delays happen. It also helps protect profit margins and competitive advantage by reallocating resources based on market demands. All in all, the debate over the EU’s 2035 combustion engine ban isn’t just about EVs versus ICEs anymore. It’s become a nuanced conversation that recognizes decarbonization needs to balance technological readiness, economic realities, and global competition. The smart move for industry players—whether manufacturers, suppliers, or investors—is likely to be one of diversification and staying flexible with policy shifts. BMW’s approach—melding electrification with ongoing ICE innovation—actually provides a pretty solid example of how to navigate this complex transition in the coming years. Source: Noah Wire Services